ROSALIND:
By no means, sir. Time travels in divers paces with divers persons.
(As You Like It 3.2.280-81)
As Tom mentioned in class the other
day, Shakespeare is meant to be performed, not read. The discrepancies in
script as well as character theories and analyses divide rather than bring
together a consensus. Rosalind makes a good point when she says times moves at
different speeds depending on the person: the staging of a Shakespearean play
will move differently depending on the period in which the performance is
produced. Not only is the approach to the material different, but so is the
approach to acting style and methods.
Preparation for theatre in
Shakespeare’s time can be assumed to be more of an individual process, as
things could only be written by hand by then – or memorized. The chances actors
each had a full script are pretty much next to none. So, what else would they
do but only memorize their own lines? Shakespeare’s plays are pretty hefty, so
any chance of actors, or players, memorizing the whole thing is, again, pretty
much next to none without tons of practice, which they did not always have. The
characters themselves have some large monologues and soliloquies, and throw in
iambic pentameter on top of that and that’s quite a bit to memorize. People in
Shakespeare’s time didn’t speak in iambic pentameter, so memorizing it during
Elizabethan theatre was probably as difficult as it is now in present day.
Acting was even more
individual-focused in Shakespeare’s time than theatre today, even with the
contributions of Stanislavski and others. There is little stage directions in Shakespeare's works,
which is typical in theatre in general, but the severe lack of stage directions
– or even, in fact, when they are missing entirely and it is up to scholarly
speculation – indicates there is more to analyze in the script for acting rather than the actor looking beyond the words on the page. The blog Shakespeare Workshops explores the
notion that the psychology of Shakespearean or verse acting was completely different based on 1) the
actors being most fully focused on their own lines rather than the action that
surrounds them onstage and 2) the lines themselves indicating exactly what the
character is feeling. This differs from modern-day acting because it leaves
out, as Shakespeare Workshops points
out, the idea of preparation and subtext. A play today rehearses together for a
certain stretch of time before their performance and must constantly go to each
rehearsal or performance prepared for what will happen throughout each
encounter and make sure each time they move or react is authentic to not only
the character but also themselves as an actor. However, a Shakespearean play
would allow the actor to fully feel more being in the moment since they are so
focused on their individual journey with the lines rather than getting caught up
in the subtext of a situation.
JACQUES:
All the world’s a stage, / And all the men and women merely players. / They
have their exits and their entrances, / And one man in his time plays many
parts…
(2.7.139-142)
Shakespeare’s players thrive on
feeling, not thinking deeply about how their actions affect the rest of the
group of actors and instead turning it in on themselves. Lines like “your
experience makes you sad” (4.1.24) and “I had rather hear you chide than this
man woo” (3.5.66) feel surface-level, but it is the characters contextualizing how
they feel about the situation rather than putting a group of characters in a certain situation. The characters
control the situation through their words, through expressing their emotions,
and that in turn shows a very different acting style for the staging of a
Shakespeare play like As You Like It
than any other modern day play, in which the characters depend on the situation
they’re placed in (and I can say that as a studying actor). More on these differences in both acting and staging another time, perhaps. Thoughts?
(My reference and for
more information on Shakespearean acting: http://shakespeareworkshops.blogspot.com/p/the-modern-actor-and-performing.html)
No comments:
Post a Comment