Wednesday, February 11, 2015

Female Revenge Plot: Then and Now





Although Tamora is essentially cast as the evil queen/manipulator/adulterer of Titus Andronicus, I feel her role in the revenge plot is sorely underappreciated. Today, revenge plots and/or diabolical females are pretty huge in Hollywood films (ex. Law Abiding Citizen; Maleficent). What then, would Shakespeare think of a movie like Kill Bill? Or, even more interesting: what would Tamora think of the Bride? For starters, both Titus Andronicus and Kill Bill would likely reach about a 9.5/10 on the gore-scale. They also follow the same general plot: Tamora seeks revenge on Titus for destroying her kingdom and sacrificing her firstborn son; the Bride goes after Bill, her former assassin boss and the father of her lost child. Most importantly, both females are survivors: Tamora survives the destruction of the Goth empire and the Bride survives her wedding-day massacre.

A major downside on Tamora’s reputation is the fact that she orchestrates the rape of Lavinia. Yes, that’s horrible. But it’s not far off from what the women of Kill Bill do to one another. In a similar grimace-worthy encounter, the Bride kills her former assassin friend, Vernita, right in front of her young daughter. That, too, is pretty low. Neither woman should be considered a monster, when they are simply driven in their revenge.

Some additional similarities in plot include rape and illegitimate babies. However, the ways in which the women handle these situations differ. Because of societal restrictions, Tamora is forced to give up her interracial baby to avoid being caught as an infidel. The Bride’s child, also a lovechild, would have at least been accepted in society. Regardless, both babies are lost (sacrificed or missing) tragically.

The rape culture of Titus also differs from that of today. Lavinia’s rape caused her death: death in social status, self-worth, and physical being. In Kill Bill, the Bride easily enacts her vengeance. In both cases, tongues are lost: Lavinia is mutilated by her rapists, but the Bride mutilates her rapists. Lavinia would never have been able to actively seek revenge on her rapists. Instead, her father commandeered the mission and made it about his own pride and honor.


However, getting back to Tamora and the Bride, there is one final difference: Tamora fails while the Bride succeeds. Tamora’s failure is likely due to the societal expectations of female villainy and the presence of a male revenge-seeker, Titus, who essentially stole all of Tamora’s thunder. To allude to the opening quote of Kill Bill, “Revenge is a dish best served cold.” Unfortunately, Tamora literally eats that dish of revenge. But on the bright side, the Bride, fellow female vengeance-seeker, succeeds in killing EVERYONE who ever wronged her.


1 comment:

  1. It is an interesting concept to compare Titus Andronicus to Kill Bill. Now granted, I have never seen the series(although I think I would enjoy it greatly based on the plot outlined in this post). However, I do believe that Shakespeare would indeed find the similarities and differences between his play and the movie quite interesting. Both productions have female characters that are out for revenge, but I think Shakespeare would be fascinated that the Bride is from a more... "righteous" side of revenge, where his character Tamora is more of the villainess side of revenge. Additionally, I believe Shakespeare would find it interesting how much harsher the crime of rape is in modern times. You are correct, in the play the rape was turned from something about Lavinia into something about Titus's honor. It was not treated as the crime it really was.

    ReplyDelete