In several plays we have read this
semester, it is clear that Shakespeare is addressing gender roles in his
work. In both As You Like It and The
Merchant of Venice, female protagonists don the clothes of men in order to
solve a dilemma that the male characters have failed to figure out. As we have noted continually in class,
Shakespeare complicates this further by acknowledging that these characters are
played exclusively by men. Yet, this is
hardly the last time cross dressing has been addressed in storytelling. Countless depictions of cross dressing have
entered the video landscape since the medium began in the dawn of the twentieth
century. B films such as Glen or Glenda, Hollywood star driven
films like Mrs. Doubtfire and Some Like it Hot, and even TV shows such
as Portlandia present characters who
wear clothes of the opposite sex. But do
these works attempt to tackle the problem of gender roles in society? Or do they use this tactic exclusively for
the sake of laughter?
While Shakespeare was forced to
write for a royal audience and had to be mindful of making a political
statement, his implementation of cross dressing characters such as Portia and
Rosalind subtly craft an argument against restriction of hetero-normative gender
roles. In The Merchant of Venice, Portia dresses as Balthazar, a doctor of
the law. Without her help, Antonio would
have been convicted and Bassanio, her husband, heartbroken. In the majority of historic drama, females
create problems, and males have solutions.
Odysseus in the Odyssey leaves an island filled with female sirens, just
to name one example. Here, however,
Portia independently creates a plan to save Bassanio. Yet, at the plays end, Bassanio eventually offers
Balthazar his wedding ring, despite her telling him to never lose, sell or give
it away. He breaks the sanctity of his
promise with his wife in order to save his best friend. True, their marriage is restored at the end
of the play-stabilizing a heteronormative state- but this can be attributed more
to Shakespeare’s royal audience than the content of the play itself. Shakespeare presents cross-dressing not as a
focal point for comedy, but as a vehicle for portraying the unfair inequality
between gender roles. Male’s, almost by
default, are allowed more agency than females.
Only by wearing the wardrobe of a man can Rosalind achieve this
independence.
However, modern media does not
have royal audiences as an excuse. In Some Like it Hot for example, a pair of
jazz playing musicians cross dress in order to escape from mafia
gangsters. The humor is centered on the
males acting in feminine ways: talking in high pitched voices, fretting over
expensive luxury items, and wishing for the attention of men. Soon, their objective becomes not only simple
escape from members of the mafia, but of seducing Marilyn Monroe’s character
(with her typical ditzy attitude) as well.
Lines such as “I wish I could just go out with you! You’re so much better than most men!” reveal the
misogyny present in the film. The jazz
musicians take advantage of their close proximity on women to spy, gain
insight, and generally act creepy. It’s
harmful because it’s logic emphasizes that men act one way, and women act
another.
While films such as Mrs. Doubtfire at least have some sort
of motivation other than laughs (he wants to be around his children), it’s hard
to argue that all of modern media is more progressive than that of the 1950’s
in this regard. White Chicks, while interesting when examining racial differences,
offers the same blasé attitude of simple “laughs” while cross-dressing. On the other hand, Portlandia is noteworthy in its handling of gender roles. In some of the sketches, the leads (Fred Armisten and Carrie Brownstein respectively) switch their gender to male
and female respectively. Yet, similar to
Shakespeare’s male only cast playing females, it is never acknowledged that
this is happening. The humor is based
off wordplay, satire, and other jokes.
The cross dressing is an aspect of it, but it’s not the focal point of
the humor. It is not making fun of it
for a laugh.
Modern media’s cross dressing is a
mixed bag. Some of it is harmful and
would probably have Shakespeare weeping soliloquy’s in his grave. Yet, shows such as Portlandia provide interesting dynamics between genders, and at
least provoke thought in the minds of Netflix bingers everywhere.
Another interesting level to think of when discussing of cross-dressing in movies is the differences between movies that present men in drag versus women in drag. When men are cross-dressing, including the movies you’ve listed and then some like “Jack and Jill” and “Big Momma’s House”, cross-dressing is strictly used for humor. The methods of inducing laughs usually come from the over-exaggeration of what society defines as stereotypic feminine characteristics and behavior. While, on the other hand, when a woman is in drag, the plot of the movie is more serious and the woman dresses as a man in order to gain respect or get ahead in life. Look at movies like “Albert Nobbs”, “Victor/Victoria”, and “Just One of the Guys”, they all deal with women who dress as men in order to survive and fufill their dreams. These differences between drag based on which sex is cross-dressing the other extremely harms society’s view and definition of gender because it restricts both masculine and feminine gender and establishes that masculine gender is more successful and consists of traits that guarantee success. Modern cross-dressing in movies is deviating away from Shakespeare’s purpose of showing that gender and sexuality is a complex and contradicting component of society and, instead, setting restrictions and saying that gender is separated in traits, characteristics, and capabilities.
ReplyDelete